Comments on: Panorama loader customization http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/ Let the world to revolve around you! Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:34:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Denis V. Chumakov http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-42 Denis V. Chumakov Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:35:40 +0000 http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-42 Yes, you are right, all of you. Next version of the player is able to use external graphical loaders. Give me examples of your dream loader. :) Yes, you are right, all of you. Next version of the player is able to use external graphical loaders. Give me examples of your dream loader. :)

]]> By: wns http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-37 wns Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:49:30 +0000 http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-37 A also agree with af and cvh. It would be much more reassuring to the user to see a familiar percentage type loader. wns A also agree with af and cvh.

It would be much more reassuring to the user to see a familiar percentage type loader.

wns

]]> By: cvh http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-28 cvh Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:43:45 +0000 http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-28 I strongly agree with pm af. The current loader is interesting for panorama geeks, but the average user will feel that they are using a complicated and unfamiliar interface. I strongly agree with pm af.
The current loader is interesting for panorama geeks, but the average user will feel that they are using a complicated and unfamiliar interface.

]]> By: af http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-27 af Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:24:16 +0000 http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-27 You may want to rethink the loader. While those familiar with projections can relate the messages to the faces, your average user has zero interest in this. The concern is simply: when do I get to see the panorama? A single percentage of the combined download based on current bytes and total bytes, in the Flash tradition, would be more useful. Also, the ability to load an animated movie clip, aka AJAX loader, or generate a graphical bar to match the progress would be useful. Both are trivial to implement and would better "complete" the player. You may want to rethink the loader. While those familiar with projections can relate the messages to the faces, your average user has zero interest in this. The concern is simply: when do I get to see the panorama? A single percentage of the combined download based on current bytes and total bytes, in the Flash tradition, would be more useful. Also, the ability to load an animated movie clip, aka AJAX loader, or generate a graphical bar to match the progress would be useful. Both are trivial to implement and would better “complete” the player.

]]> By: jab http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-26 jab Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:32:48 +0000 http://flashpanoramas.com/blog/2006/12/31/panorama-loader-customization/#comment-26 hi, we're now able to customize loader text, that's very cool :) just an idea: instead of writing all faces states on each cube face, why now try to write each face % on itself? i mean a front loader for the front face, left loader for the left face... regards hi,

we’re now able to customize loader text, that’s very cool :)

just an idea: instead of writing all faces states on each cube face, why now try to write each face % on itself?

i mean a front loader for the front face, left loader for the left face…

regards

]]>